One other Take a look at the Coors Conundrum
8 min read

Since becoming a member of MLB as an enlargement group in 1993, the Rockies have received 46.9% of their video games. Amongst energetic franchises, that mark stands because the third worst. Granted, most different groups have had much more time to determine themselves, and the Rockies have bested their 1993 enlargement counterparts within the Marlins (although given the choice, they’d in all probability take the Marlins’ two World Collection championships). However they’ve additionally been handily outpaced by the 1998 enlargement groups, the Diamondbacks and the Rays, who’ve every posted successful percentages of 48.5%. Additional, the Rockies nonetheless have the fifth-worst successful proportion even when we restrict our scope to 2000 onwards. These outcomes don’t line up with the Rockies’ spending, particularly as of late, which has positioned them in the midst of the pack by way of payroll — that’s, till we take into account the Coors impact.
The Rockies’ pitching has lengthy dragged down the fortunes of the group as a complete. Since 2000, they’ve simply been the worst workers within the majors with a 4.93 ERA. But it surely isn’t totally their fault: pitches move sub-optimally and balls fly further in Colorado. The entrance workplace has tried numerous cures, particularly choosing extra groundball-heavy or low-BABIP pitchers. Neither of these methods has labored all that properly, however some proposals carry promise, like the concept of relying extra on gyro spin and/or utilizing the lesser impacts of Magnus power in Colorado in an advantageous manner.
However the innovation in Denver seems to be at a little bit of a standstill, presumably resulting from unrealistic expectations concerning the Rockies’ present stage of competitiveness. Self-evaluation points apart, on a latest episode of Successfully Wild, Ben Lindbergh and Meg Rowley described the Rockies as a group that might theoretically be extra constant if they honestly discovered learn how to navigate taking part in half of their video games at Coors. That obtained me considering, and whereas I definitely don’t purport to supply the ultimate reply, I do hope to provide a distinct perspective on the issue.
Over the past a number of weeks, I’ve written lots about swing selections: First-pitch swing selections and the way they’re influenced by the earlier hitter’s end result, two-strike swing selections and the way they relate to loss-aversion, and even a bit about swing selections after hard-hit foul balls. What about in the case of Colorado? Upon arriving in essentially the most hitter-friendly park within the huge leagues, do batters change their strategy with a view to be extra aggressive?
On my journey to reply this query, I first appeared on the Rockies themselves. I figured that these donning black and purple would see the most important modifications in strategy going to and from Colorado, given their acute consciousness of the intense run-scoring atmosphere there. In case you’re questioning, they started utilizing a humidor in Coors beginning in 2002. Provided that I wanted pitch-tracking knowledge, which on Baseball Savant goes again to 2008, with a view to assess strategy, the preliminary implementation of the humidor didn’t have any influence on my pattern — it in all probability wouldn’t have anyhow as a result of it had little impact on offense. The Rockies did opt to boost their partitions previous to the 2016 season, so I included separate rows for that interval. I additionally excluded 2020 due to the brief season and lack of followers. Right here’s what I discovered:
Rockies House vs. Away, 2008-2022
Break up | wOBA | Swing% | SwStr% | O-Swing% | Z-Swing% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
House | 0.362 | 47.6 | 10.4 | 28.2 | 67.7 |
Away | 0.293 | 47.7 | 11.8 | 30.3 | 66.1 |
House (2016-22) | 0.360 | 48.5 | 11.5 | 28.5 | 68.7 |
Away (2016-22) | 0.290 | 48.6 | 12.6 | 30.7 | 67.6 |
The wall-height improve didn’t actually change issues; the post-wall Rockies simply swung extra throughout the board. Unsurprisingly, there’s all the time been a large home-road break up by way of wOBA. That may largely be chalked as much as the decreased pitch motion and jumpier batted balls in Coors (although the Coors hangover probably performed a task too; extra on that later). The Rockies did have a noticeable enchancment in plate self-discipline at house, chasing much less and swinging at extra strikes, which can have led to a decrease swinging strike price. This may also have been due to the decreased motion, which renders pitches extra trackable. Their general swing proportion, nevertheless, remained nearly similar at house and on the street.
Unusually, Rockies hitters noticed extra pitches within the zone at house (49.2% to 48.6%). My first thought was that pitchers may be having hassle with their command, permitting sure choices to leak over the plate unintentionally resulting from their newfound lack of motion. Which may nonetheless be a risk, however extra probably, it’s as a result of the Rockies had been forward within the depend extra usually at house (27.5% of the time to 26.1%). Pitchers throw within the zone extra usually when hitters are forward:
The Significance of Rely
Break up | wOBA | Swing% | SwStr% | O-Swing% | Z-Swing% | Zone% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H-Forward | 0.423 | 50.1 | 9.9 | 28.1 | 67.7 | 55.6 |
P-Forward | 0.224 | 51.5 | 13.3 | 33.6 | 79.8 | 38.8 |
Even | 0.303 | 40.8 | 9.3 | 24.5 | 56.8 | 50.3 |
This may additionally clarify the enhancements in self-discipline to some extent, because the O-Swing and Z-Swing charges forward within the depend carefully resemble these of the Rockies at house. Even controlling for depend didn’t end in a significant change within the home-road Swing% or Zone% break up, although, indicating a fairly uniform strategy in accordance these metrics throughout environments.
Again to the drafting board. If the Rockies didn’t meaningfully change their strategy once they arrived at Coors, did their opponents? In different phrases, did they deal with Coors like a particular form of away recreation, or did they deal with it like another?
Non-Rockies At Coors vs. Away Elsewhere
Break up | wOBA | Swing% | SwStr% | O-Swing% | Z-Swing% | Zone% | H-Forward% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coors | 0.344 | 46.9 | 10.2 | 26.7 | 67.3 | 49.7 | 27.9 |
Elsewhere | 0.311 | 46.5 | 10.8 | 28.7 | 65.4 | 48.6 | 27.1 |
They didn’t change any greater than the Rockies themselves: There have been related enhancements in plate self-discipline in addition to related jumps in zone price and hitter-ahead price. There was a slight improve in swing price, however not sufficient to be significant.
It looks like hitters don’t actually leap on the likelihood to play in Coors, at the least not in a manner that reveals up of their strategy. However whereas the Rockies and their opponents didn’t meaningfully differ in how they modified their strategy upon arriving in Colorado, they differed in how the atmosphere impacted their efficiency.
Coors is assumed to inflict a “hangover” on Rockies’ gamers upon their departure from Denver. They’ve a daft home-road break up by way of successful proportion: at house, they’ve been the 12th-best group since their founding, whereas on the street, they’ve been the flat-out worst. It’s potential that in making an attempt to determine what works at Coors, the Rockies’ entrance workplace has uncared for to amass the sorts of gamers who carry out properly in every single place else. However there’s additionally an actual adjustment interval that appears to happen when the Rockies embark on a street journey. Previous to the 2020 season, Charlie Blackmon spearheaded an effort to attempt to treatment this, centered round extra game-like batting observe, however the Rockies haven’t made actual progress since then. Their 2021 noticed a near-historically giant home-road break up, and final yr, that they had the 18th-best file at house and the second-worst on the street.
The 18-point gulf between the Rockies’ house wOBA (.362) and that of their guests’ (.344, 5 p.c decrease) since 2008 is considerably bigger than the league-average home-road hole of 11 factors (3.4 p.c decrease). It’s additionally the ninth-largest hole in that point span. The share variations point out that this isn’t only a byproduct of upper general wOBAs, however in the event you wanted extra proof, take into account the Reds’ Nice American Ball Park.
Whereas Coors is leagues above all different stadiums in the case of being a hitter haven, in response to our park factors, GABP is in a tie with Fenway for the second-highest primary issue, which means it’s the second-most hitter pleasant. It additionally has the best house run issue given its bandbox dimensions. However the Reds’ wOBA at house bests that of their guests by simply two factors.
And it’s not just like the Reds have been worse than the Rockies; in truth, their successful proportion throughout this span has been six factors increased. There’s both one thing about adjusting to Coors that widens the host-visitor hole, or the Rockies have completed an excellent job of discovering gamers who actually do carry out higher than anticipated at Coors (whether or not or not they’ll carry out on the street). The entire gaps bigger than the Rockies’ belong to the perfect performers of the previous 15 years, a bunch inside which they don’t belong: The Dodgers, Yankees, Rays, Crimson Sox, Cardinals, Braves, and Astros. In the meantime, the Reds are conserving firm with the Twins and Padres, whose successful percentages have been extra in keeping with their very own.
Yet one more factor that taking a look at GABP keyed me in on was that the enhancements in plate self-discipline there have been a lot much less pronounced than these at Coors. This regardless of the Reds having a home-road break up in hitter-ahead price much like that of the Rockies:
GABP House vs. Away
Break up | wOBA | Swing% | SwStr% | O-Swing% | Z-Swing% | Zone% | H-Pleasant% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reds House | 0.326 | 47.1 | 11.1 | 28.2 | 67.4 | 48.2 | 27.3 |
Reds Away | 0.305 | 47.6 | 10.9 | 28.8 | 67.3 | 48.7 | 26.3 |
Away Groups @ GABP | 0.324 | 46.5 | 11.2 | 28.7 | 65.9 | 47.7 | 27.4 |
Away Groups Total (Minus Coors) | 0.311 | 46.5 | 10.8 | 28.7 | 65.4 | 48.6 | 27.1 |
The similarity of the hitter-ahead price modifications for the Reds and Rockies implies that the unusual pitch actions in Coors aren’t a significant component in pushing the depend in favor of the hitter. Somewhat, pitchers would possibly simply fall behind extra usually once they’re not at house as a result of they’re in an unfamiliar atmosphere with hostile followers. Vice versa for the hitters, who’ve a better time settling into the field once they’re at house.
To come back full circle, there weren’t any significant modifications in swing proportion when getting into Coors or GABP, placing my aggression concept to mattress. What’s extra, even the enhancements in plate self-discipline at Coors are trying like they’ve little to do with the sphere’s hitter-friendly nature, on condition that we didn’t see the identical enhancements at GABP. On the identical time, whereas the magnitude of the modifications in plate self-discipline differed for the 2 stadiums, that of the modifications in hitter-ahead price didn’t. This makes me suppose that hitter-ahead price may not be accountable for the plate self-discipline enhancements at Coors in spite of everything; the unusual pitch actions are. So whereas Coors’ standing as a hitter’s haven doesn’t trigger a change in strategy in and of itself, one of many attributes that makes it a haven does. Solely time will inform whether or not pitchers’ choices will leak out over the plate extra usually in Colorado eternally or in the event that they’ll find a way (and prepared) to make use of these findings to their benefit one way or the other.